top of page
Search
  • vitod1

Evaluating splicing-derived neoantigen burden pan-cancer using SpliceMut

Theron Palmer, BS, Department of biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Elana J. Fertig, PhD, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Bloomberg Kimmel Immunology Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD


Poster # 68


Aberrant alternative splicing can generate neoantigens, which can themselves stimulate immune responses and surveillance. Previous methods for quantifying splicing-derived neoantigens are limited by independent references and potential batch effects. Here, we introduce SpliceMutr, a bioinformatics pipeline for identifying splicing-derived neoantigens from tumor and normal data. SpliceMutr facilitates the identification of tumor-specific antigenic splice variants, predicts MHC-binding affinity, and estimates splicing  antigenicity scores per gene. By applying this tool to genomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we generate splicing-derived neoantigens and neoantigenicity scores per sample and across 15 cancer types and find numerous correlations between splicing antigenicity and well-established biomarkers of anti-tumor immunity. Notably, carriers of mutations within splicing machinery genes have higher splicing antigenicity, which provides support for our approach. Further analysis of splicing antigenicity in cohorts of melanoma patients treated with mono- or combined immune checkpoint inhibition suggest that the abundance of splicing antigens is decreased post-treatment from baseline in patients who progress, likely because of an immunoediting process. We also observe increased splicing antigenicity in responders to immunotherapy, which may relate to an increased capacity to mount an immune response to splicing-derived antigens. We find the splicing antigenicity to be higher in tumor samples when compared to normal, that mutations in the splicing machinery result in increased splicing antigenicity in some cancers, and higher splicing antigenicity is associated with positive response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Further, this new computational pipeline provides novel analytical capabilities for splicing antigenicity and is openly available for further immuno-oncologic analysis.

4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page